Bottleneck Amplifier
AI capability → Human-absorbable decisions
100% human agency with AI acceleration.
"The bottleneck isn't AI capability anymore. It's human reception."
"100% human orchestrating of AI—I call it 'AI in the loop' as a contrarian to the stupid 2025 'human in the loop.'"
The Problem
"Human in the loop" frames humans as obstacles to automation. The industry pushes for smarter AI, more autonomy, less human involvement.
But there's a 1000x gap between what AI can do and what humans actually use it for. The bottleneck isn't AI capability. It's human reception.
"There is an ever-expanding gap between the hyper-exponential AI tech acceleration and the practical human largely hyper-underutilized adoption—like the year after the industrial revolution till adoption and absorption, only 1000x."
The Framework Is Unique
After extensive searching through 2024-2025 AI frameworks and theories, there is nothing identical or even substantially similar to the SHELET protocol's core insight about compression and human agency.
What makes it different:
- • Not about AI alignment or safety theater
- • Not about "responsible AI" PR
- • Not about slowing down AI capability
- • About compressing infinity into human-decidable choices
The Inversion
AI in the loop, human as sovereign. The bottleneck isn't a bug—it's the feature that keeps humans in control.
Don't eliminate the bottleneck. Amplify through it.
Concrete Example
Task: Hire a contractor from 500 applicants
Human made 1 decision. AI handled 499 eliminations + all logistics. But the human chose who to hire. That's sovereignty.
The Three Axioms
The SHELET Protocol
שלט (SHELET) = Hebrew for control/dominion
∞ → 10⁶Digitize reality10⁶ → 10³Extract patterns10³ → 1Human decides1 → ∞AI acts with audit trailThe Vision Is Now Mainstream
What started as contrarian is becoming corporate consulting language. McKinsey's "The Agentic Organization" (September 2025) echoes the same thesis:
"In the agentic organization, humans remain the orchestrators... AI systems execute at scale, but human judgment remains sovereign."
The difference: they're selling it as innovation. This is survival infrastructure.
The Core Thesis
"The natural and inevitable bottleneck by definition is the ability of AI to 'download' the data to the human so he understands enough to have 100% agency."
"AI is never becoming sentient... humans will have 100% agency always. This is pashut."
Documentation
Roadmap
- Core thesis and axioms
- SHELET Protocol
- Implementation case studies
- Academic formalization
Contribute
Submit case studies, implementation examples, or critiques.
Open an issue →